up state news

UpState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 05:50 - 30.03.2010 News >> Latest

     Sarah Palin's media empire
    For now, Palin takes an obvious delight in tweaking the very media establishment that is fueling her fameRead Article

    Read more...
  • 09:20 - 06.04.2009 News >> Latest

    Gianfranco Fini: The best leader the Italian left never had The former fascist's long march to the centre could keep the party of Silvio Berlusconi in power long after the PM goes Peter Popham - Letter from Rome
    Sunday, 5 April 2009   The most dangerous politician in Italy is a tall, bony, bespectacled chain-smoker with a cellphone, whose ringtone is the noise of an Italian police siren. In a country full of jovial charmers, Gianfranco Fini makes no effort to ingratiate himself: it is simpler, and more effective, to intimidate. If Benito Mussolini were able to make his feelings known from beyond the grave, one senses he would be well pleased with the man who is his political heir. But Mr Fini, who is arguably the second most powerful person in Italy after his chief, Silvio Berlusconi, is not dangerous through being a fascist. Although he was until last month the leader of the party that bore the legacy of Mussolini, it is doubtful whether the "F" word was ever a useful stick to beat him with. Certainly in the past 15 years, since Berlusconi stunned the Italian political world by bringing Mr Fini's far-right party in from the cold and putting senior members of it in his first government, Mr Fini has accomplished the sort of revolution on the right that in Britain it took the combined efforts of John Smith, Neil Kinnock and Tony Blair to accomplish for the Labour Party. In the process he has established himself as Mr Berlusconi's heir-apparent, his indispensable colleague, and one of the very few senior politicians with the guts to tell "il cavaliere" on a regular basis that he has lost the plot. So that is one reason, looked at from the perspective of the left, why Mr Fini is a danger: because, aged 57, he promises continuity in government to the Italian right long beyond the date when Mr Berlusconi, 72, will be tucked up in bed. The other reason is more profound: on his long march from the political wilderness to the sunny grassland of the centre, he has reinvented himself as a conviction liberal: the champion of women and immigrants, the enemy of autocracy, and in particular the persistent and fearless critic of the Catholic Church and its constant meddling in Italian politics. Mr Fini has loped into the centre-left's garden and stolen their clothes. The inaugural convention last month in Rome of Silvio Berlusconi's new political party, "Il Popolo della libertà" ("The People of Freedom"), was classic Berlusconi: it opened with Beethoven's "Ode to Joy", followed by a 90-minute speech from the boss, and closed with the party's unofficial anthem, entitled "Menomale che Silvio c'è", which roughly translates as "Thank heavens we've got Silvio." Like the gatherings of his deceased party Forza Italia, it was another slick celebration of the Berlusconi personality cult. But Mr Berlusconi's clownishness inoculates him against that sort of criticism: it's hard to think of anybody so willing…

    Read more...
  • 15:53 - 15.02.2010 News >> Latest

     Labour painsBarack Obama will never satisfy his union backers. Nor should he try Read Article

    Read more...
  • 11:24 - 30.06.2009 News >> Latest

       The lessons of Iraq   Telegraph View:

    Comments 10 | Comment on this article  It has been more than six years since George W Bush's infamous "Mission Accomplished" sign prematurely implied an end to America's entanglement in Iraq. Today, US forces are finally taking their most significant step yet towards withdrawal, moving their forces to bases away from population centres. The troops will still be patrolling, but will from now on become a steeply diminishing part of the daily lives of ordinary Iraqis.As one foreign invader moves out, so Iraq welcomes the next. Foreign oil companies are already discussing the development of the country's vast natural wealth. The subsequent spoils will have to be divided between Iraq's forever-feuding groups, Shia, Sunni and Kurd; and that serves as a reminder that while the country may be a better place than it was under Saddam Hussein, many of its problems have barely been tackled. It is not even clear that the fragile Iraqi security forces can protect their people. The Americans have issues of their own to confront. After the initial success of Operation Iraqi Freedom, they made some serious mistakes in this venture. In particular, there were few plans made for the post-invasion administration of the nation, while the disbanding of the Iraqi armed forces created a legion of fighters willing to enmesh the coalition in a protracted, and devastating, campaign. The resulting loss of US prestige saw belligerents from Iran to North Korea first taunt, and then test the resolve, of what remains the world's most powerful nation.The worry now is what happens when a chastened America is forced into decisive and far-reaching action again. Barack Obama knows that he could easily have to replace rhetoric with deeds, in particular in the Middle East. Has America learned enough from its mistakes? We can only hope so.      

    Read more...
  • 13:12 - 07.07.2010 News >> Latest

      Former Top CIA Spy on How US Intelligence Became Big Business Intelligence veteran Robert Grenier worked covertly in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. He recently offered a rare glimpse into the world of radically privatized intelligence, Blackwater and the CIA assassination program. Read Article  

    Read more...
US threatens to derail climate talks Print E-mail

 

 

US threatens to derail climate talks by refusing to include Kyoto targets

 

Protocol seen as basis for Copenhagen negotiations but America refuses to be 'stuck with agreement 20 years old'

 

Workers build a sea wall as sea water breaches a highway in Laem Talumpuk cape

Workers build a sea wall defence in southern Thailand as climate negotiators discuss a replacement to the Kyoto protocol in Bangkok. Photograph: VINAI DITHAJOHN/EPA

 

 

The US threatened to derail a deal on global climate change today in a public showdown with China by expressing deep opposition to the existing Kyoto protocol. The US team also urged other rich countries to join it in setting up a new legal agreement which would, unlike Kyoto, force all countries to reduce emissions.

 

In a further development, the EU sided strongly with the US in seeking a new agreement, but said that it hoped the best elements of Kyoto could be kept. China and many developing countries immediately hit back stating that the protocol, the world's only legally binding commitment to get countries to reduce emissions, was "not negotiable".

 

With only a few days of formal UN negotiations remaining before the crunch Copenhagen meeting in December, and the world's two largest emitters refusing to give ground, a third way may now have to be found to secure a climate change agreement. Last night it emerged that lawyers for the EU are in talks with the US delegation urgently seeking a way out of the impasse that now threatens a strong climate deal.

 

In a day of high international rhetoric, chief US negotiator Jonathan Pershing said the US had moved significantly in the last year. "There has been a startling change in the US position. There is now engagement. We have had a 10-fold increase finance from the US. We have put $80bn into a green economic stimulus package. One year ago there was no commitment to a global agreement."

 

But he forcefully outlined America's opposition to the Kyoto protocol. "We are not going to be in the Kyoto protocol. We are not going to be part of an agreement that we cannot meet. We say a new agreement has to [be signed] by all countries. Things have changed since Kyoto. Where countries were in 1990 and today is very different. We cannot be stuck with an agreement 20 years old. We want action from all countries."

 

Yu Qingtai, China's special representative on climate talks, said rich countries should not desert the Kyoto agreement, which all industrialised countries except the US signed up to and was ratified in 2002 after many years of negotiations. It contains no requirement for developing countries to cut greenhouse gas emissions, as both their current and historical emissions are low in most cases. However, China, with its surging economy and rapidly expanding population is now the world's biggest polluter.

 

"The Kyoto protocol is not negotiable. We want [it] to be strengthened. We don't want to kill Kyoto. We really want a revival, a strengthening of the treaty. That can only be done by Annex I [industrialised] countries having a target of 40% cuts by 2020," said Yu.

 

"We have an agreement. If you take that away [you remove] the basis of negotiations. There are specific provisions for parties [like the US] who are not signed up to the Kyoto protocol."

 

China was backed strongly by the G77 group of 130 countries and the Alliance of Small Island States (Aosis), made up of Caribbean and Pacific countries which expect to be made uninhabitable in the next few generations if a strong climate agreement is not secured.

 

"We face an emergency. We want commitments. We did not create the problem. Any mechanism currently in use is one we want to maintain. National actions are important but they are no substitutes for an international framework," said Dessima Williams, a Grenadian spokeswoman for Aosis.

 

The EU, today sided openly with the US for the first time. "We look at the Kyoto protocol, but since it came into force we have seen emissions increase. It has not decreased emissions. It's not enough and we need more," said spokesman Karl Falkenberg.

 

"We are very unlikely to see the US join Kyoto, but we are working with the US to find a legal framework to allow the US to participate and which will allow large emitters [such as China] to participate."

 

The difference between the sides is now considered to threaten the success of the talks. In essence, the US is insisting on a completely new agreement, with all countries signed up and all countries free to choose and set their own targets and timetable. Most other countries want to keep the existing agreement as a basis for negotiations, to ensure that rich countries are held by international law to agreed cuts. China in particular wants cuts calculated on a per capita basis.

 

Diplomats last night suggested that the only way out could be for the US to be asked to sign a separate agreement acceptable to developing countries, which would see it cutting emissions at a comparable speed to other countries.

 

The G77 countries are meeting to consider their oppositions. One diplomat said: "They are very angry. People have talked of walking out."

 

However, lawyers said it would be difficult to terminate the Kyoto protocol because all parties have to formally agree by consensus to end it. In addition, if no further commitment periods after 2012 are established for rich countries, it would be a breach of their own legal agreements.

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Links
DownState News
Latest News

© 2010 Up State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development