up state news

UpState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 02:22 - 03.02.2010 News >> Latest

      Miranda Mimi Kuo for The New York TimesVanishing of Chinese Dissident Stirs FearsBy ANDREW JACOBS Experts say the disappearance of a human rights lawyer, Gao Zhisheng, above, with no official accounting, is a disturbing milestone.   

    Read more...
  • 06:46 - 24.02.2010 News >> Latest

      Google execs convicted Three Google executives convicted under privacy laws in Italy.   

    Read more...
  • 08:14 - 26.01.2010 News >> Latest

     Bill Gates has let China downIn contrast to Google's stand against online censorship, Gates's 'business as usual' comments betray China's internet usersZhang Hong guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 26 January 2010 Article historyDownplaying internet censorship ... Bill Gates. Photograph: KPA/Zuma/Rex FeaturesI am not surprised by Bill Gates and his close partner Steve Ballmer downplaying Google's decision to retreat from China. I assume this is a business comment intended to placate the Chinese government and help Microsoft's Bing search engine in the Chinese market.Microsoft's biggest failure has been its ignorance of new search engine technologies. This means its current biggest rival is Google – while people believe Microsoft has become too stuck in its ways to catch up with new technological trends. Bing is Microsoft's rival to Google and China has the world's largest number of net users. So it's commercially correct for Gates and Ballmer to blame Google for being too sensitive.However, they might be too optimistic about China's internet environment, especially concerning online censorship. It might not be difficult for tech-savvy users to skirt the Great Firewall of China. China now has 384 million net users. But very few people have the skill and the means to gain access to those restricted contents. Filtering of search engines has become a very serious problem that prevents normal users from getting access to the information they need.Google's announcement made a big splash across China. On the day, many net users voiced their support for the company and some even demonstrated in front of the company's headquarters. Local people were showing their respect for a company that will finally apply its global motto "Don't Be Evil" to China, treating it the same as other markets. I am sure traffic on Google.cn doubled, if not tripled, on that day as Google removed the content filtering. This proves how eager Chinese users are for an unfiltered internet environment. Google says it's now negotiating with the Chinese government. I doubt the government will compromise on this issue, as it concerns the legacy of the ruling party and also so-called "social stability". But I strongly support the company that has put its business interests aside to challenge this ugly and evil internet censorship regime. If Google sticks to its decision to shut down the filtered Google.cn, it will gain more net users around the world, including me.    

    Read more...
  • 16:26 - 06.04.2009 News >> Latest

         

    Read more...
  • 07:24 - 13.06.2010 News >> Latest

     Saudi Arabia gives Israel clear skies to attack Iranian nuclear sitesSaudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defences to enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Times can reveal. In the week that the UN Security Council imposed a new round of sanctions on Tehran, defence sources in the Gulf say that Riyadh has agreed to allow Israel to use a narrow corridor of its airspace in the north of the country to shorten the distance for a bombing run on Iran. To ensure the Israeli bombers pass unmolested, Riyadh has carried out tests to make certain its own jets are not scrambled and missile defence systems not activated. Once the Israelis are through, the kingdom’s air defences will return to full alert. “The Saudis have given their permission for the Israelis to pass over and they will look the other way,” said a US defence source in the area. “They have already done tests to make sure their own jets aren’t scrambled and no one gets shot down. This has all been done with the agreement of the [US] State Department.” Sources in Saudi Arabia say it is common knowledge within defence circles in the kingdom that an arrangement is in place if Israel decides to launch the raid. Despite the tension between the two governments, they share a mutual loathing of the regime in Tehran and a common fear of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. “We all know this. We will let them [the Israelis] through and see nothing,” said one. The four main targets for any raid on Iran would be the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Qom, the gas storage development at Isfahan and the heavy-water reactor at Arak. Secondary targets include the lightwater reactor at Bushehr, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium when complete. The targets lie as far as 1,400 miles (2,250km) from Israel; the outer limits of their bombers’ range, even with aerial refuelling. An open corridor across northern Saudi Arabia would significantly shorten the distance. An airstrike would involve multiple waves of bombers, possibly crossing Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Aircraft attacking Bushehr, on the Gulf coast, could swing beneath Kuwait to strike from the southwest. Passing over Iraq would require at least tacit agreement to the raid from Washington. So far, the Obama Administration has refused to give its approval as it pursues a diplomatic solution to curbing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Military analysts say Israel has held back only because of this failure to secure consensus from America and Arab states. Military analysts doubt that an airstrike alone would be sufficient to knock out the key nuclear facilities, which are heavily fortified and deep underground or within mountains. However, if the latest sanctions prove ineffective the pressure from the Israelis on Washington to approve military action will intensify. Iran vowed to continue enriching uranium after the UN Security Council imposed its toughest sanctions yet in an…

    Read more...
LondonTimes: Behind the scenes at Inauguration. Print E-mail

 

From The Times
January 24, 2009

Barack Obama: behind the scene pictures of the inauguration

Michelle and Barack Obama on Inauguration Day

(Callie Shell/Aurora for Time Magazine)

Michelle and Barack Obama sharing a moment just before the inauguration ceremony


VIEW A GALLERY OF THE IMAGES

There was another side to the inauguration of Barack Obama. This is the story from behind the scenes, described in an extraordinary series of photographs by Callie Shell, images of a family preparing for an extraordinary public responsibility. Shell had unprecedented access to the Obamas throughout the election campaign and here her camera captures the events backstage as the grand finale unfolds. They offer a glimpse of events far from the pageantry, oratory and noise; moments of family intimacy, private contemplation, and history in the making.

The transfer of power in Washington was the largest, loudest, best-organised, most colourful, celebrity-studded and strangest inauguration ever held.

It began with a cold snap and ended in a blizzard of executive orders. The right-handed white Republican President gave way to a mixed-race Democrat self-proclaimed “leftie”. Two million people converged on Washington DC, cheered, paraded, danced then poured out again, leaving behind 130 tonnes of inaugural rubbish.

The age of Bush limped to an end, widely unmourned, and the era of Obama began at a sprint, with a sobering gust of rhetoric, an all-night bash and a mighty task in hand.

It was cold on Tuesday morning. So cold that shivering, blue-fingered journalists in the National Mall wondered how many of the predicted millions would show up. They did come, marching out of the frost like a vast padded-jacketed army, young and old, Democrat but also Republican, white, Hispanic and foreign.

A majority of expectant faces in the crowd were black — 139 years after the first African-American cast his vote the political ground had shifted.

In the VIP stand very cold, very famous people began to assemble as if for an Oscar ceremony in a walk-in freezer. No work was done in Hollywood this day: here were Steven Spielberg, Dustin Hoffman, John Cusack and Denzel Washington. There was much neck-craning as royalty itself arrived and Oprah Winfrey took her seat.

Not quite all hatchets were buried. The Carters, it is said, snubbed the Clintons in the corridors of power. Senator Edward Kennedy, seriously ill with brain cancer and wearing a large hat, waved to the crowd in a frail reminder of another time and another young presidency of infinite promise.

The Obamas, meanwhile, entered their new home for coffee with the Bushes. It was a moment of traditional protocol agony that the outgoing President undermined by grinning broadly and blowing kisses to the White House when he left.

Dick Cheney appeared in a wheelchair after straining his back moving boxes. There was something about his glacial grin that suggested that the Vice-President was grimly aware of the irony of being wheeled out of office, feet first.Two dozen outriders formed a spear-shape ahead of the motorcade and screamed away as the President and President-elect sat side-by-side in a limousine for the last time, and quite possibly the first.

The Obama children, sweet and smart in J. Crew outfits, took their seats. Their mother, Michelle, wore a lemongrass-yellow coat and matching dress with green leather gloves. George Bush Sr peered out from beneath an enormous fur hat that made him look like a retired Davy Crockett. Mr Obama wore a smile of half-wonder when he walked loose-limbed down the steps to a booming compere’s voice announcing: “Bar-Rak . . . H . . . O-Bah-Mah!”.

 

Aretha Franklin hammered out My Country, ’Tis of Thee. The Queen of Soul was entirely upholstered in shimmering grey and topped with a colossal shiny bow hat. Respect. A quartet composed of the cellist Yo-Yo Ma, the violinist Itzhak Perlman, the pianist Gabriella Montero and the clarinetist Anthony McGill, playing along with a pre-taped classical medley (it was too cold for a genuine live concert) and the crowd pretended to like it as much as they had liked Aretha.

Mr Obama rose to take the oath and suddenly the moment went wobbly. After two years of campaign speeches, millions of lines of oratory delivered word perfect, the new President was unable to say the 35 words of the oath in the correct order. Was it nerves? Was it John Roberts, the Chief Justice, feeding him the wrong cue? Was this revenge for Mr Obama failing to vote for the confirmation of Mr Roberts in 2005? Or did his concentration lapse when he cracked a joke when a footstool was drawn up for Sasha, 7, to stand on: “That’s for you,” he said to his wife, who is as tall as he is.

Whatever the reason, according to some constitutional theorists Mr Obama did not become President, which made his deputy Joe Biden, albeit briefly, the president. Mr Biden did not take advantage of this sudden honour.

The words of Mr Obama’s speech were similarly unexpected. Many had come anticipating soaring oratory, the punchy optimism of the “Yes we can” candidate.

Instead he spoke of crisis and challenges ahead, of America’s ability to renew itself. It is a time, he warned, of “gathering clouds and raging storms”, winter in the world: the crowd cheered — but wrapped their jackets a little tighter.

After a poem that even its author, Elizabeth Alexander, seemed to have trouble remembering, the new first couple glided down Pennsylvania Avenue in the bulletproof limousine, finally emerging in the dying light to greet the crowd and holding hands as they walked past the great monuments of US power.

For the next two hours the President stood his ground manfully while 13,000 people marched past in the inaugural parade. He waved at native Americans on horseback from the Crow nation that has adopted him, he saluted the military bands and made the ‘shaka’ sign — the traditional hang-loose gesture of Hawaii — to a band from Punahou school in Honolulu, his alma mater.

By this point, 15 hours into the celebrations, Mr Obama must have wished he was back in Hawaii on a beach. Instead he changed into his white tie and tails and set off to dance at ten parties before ten adoring crowds. The Obamas swayed to I’ve Been Loving You So Long. The President stepped on the hem of the Jason Wu gown that his wife was wearing but made up for it. “How good-looking is my wife?” he asked the crowd. It was a statement, not a question.

By 1am the Obamas were asleep, for the first time, in the private residence at the White House . . . and four hours later the lights were on again.

By 8.35am Rahm Emanuel, the new Chief of Staff, was already briefing the President in the Oval Office. Mr Emanuel is someone who likes waking people up.

The President attended a morning prayer service in Washington National Cathedral, attended by 3,200 people and church leaders from 20 faiths. There followed a first day of punishing presidential hyper-activity as Mr Obama set about dismantling the Bush legacy with the same unsentimental vigour as the workers on the Mall pulling apart the scaffolding from the day before. In the space of 12 hours the President proposed the closure of the Guantánamo Bay prison camp, demanded a higher ethical code, issued a pay freeze for senior staff, discussed the $800 billion spending package, held a video conference with his national security team and generals in Iraq and Afghanistan, and called four Middle East leaders to talk about a peace initiative.

The executive orders, followed by others banning torture and closing so-called ghost prisons abroad, were signed, one after the other, with his left hand. “I’m a leftie,” he said. “Get used to it.”

Obama-mania showed little sign of abating: the website for J. Crew crashed, and its share price soared thanks to the outfits worn by the Obama children.

The repudiation of the Bush years could not have been more explicit: “It is precisely our ideals that give us the strength and moral high ground to effectively deal with the unthinking violence that we see emanating from terrorist organisations,” he said.

In possibly the most surreal moment of the entire inauguration week, about 30 hours after he had been sworn in, Mr Obama did it again. “We decided it was so much fun,” he said.

Some had begun to question whether the first, mangled oath was really valid and so, like some presidential Groundhog Day, the scene was re-enacted, this time in private. “The bad news for the reporters is that there are 12 more balls,” he joked.

“Are you ready to take the oath?” asked Chief Justice Roberts, a second time. “I am,” said the President. “And we’re going to do it very slowly.”

That was the only slow moment in a week that passed in a whirlwind of change, of pageantry and pomp but also of unscripted informality and one hilarious snafu; a week in which a black man took up residence in the White House and claimed the moral high ground, demonstrating that this double-oathed President intends to do nothing by halves.

 

 

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Links
DownState News
Latest News

© 2010 Up State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development