up state news

UpState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 07:54 - 07.03.2009 News >> Latest

    Must Jews always see themselves as victims? Fierce debate has been raging in 'The Independent' about Israel's conduct in Gaza. Here, one leading Jewish thinker argues that until Jews shake off their persecution complex, there can never be peace in the Middle East By Antony Lerman
    Saturday, 7 March 2009  In the wake of Israel's attack on Gaza, eager voices are telling us that anti-Semitism has returned – yet again. Eight years of Hamas rockets and the world unfairly cries foul when Israel retaliates, they say. Biased media are delegitimising the Jewish state. The Left attacks Israel as uniquely evil, making it the persecuted Jew among the nations. Even theatres keep wheeling out those anti-Semitic stereotypes, Shylock, Fagin and the "chosen people", just to torment us. If this bleak picture were an accurate portrayal of what Jews are experiencing today, who could deny that suffering is the determining feature of the Jewish condition? Related articles Robert Fisk’s World: A Christian painter who could not see the light in Palestine In most Jewish circles, if you pause to question this narrative and suggest that it might be exaggerated, that it unrealistically implies a level of dreadfulness and victimhood unique to Jews, you'll attract hostility and disbelief in equal measure, and precious little public sympathy. But in the work of Professor Salo Baron, probably the greatest Jewish historian of the 20th century, we find powerful justification for just such a questioning. Professor Baron spoke out angrily against what he called the "lachrymose conception of Jewish history", which placed suffering at the centre of Jewish life. "Suffering is part of the destiny" of the Jews," Professor Baron said in an interview in 1975, "but so is repeated joy as well as ultimate redemption." Another distinguished historian, Professor Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi, said Baron always fought against the view of Jewish history as "all darkness and no light. He laboured mightily to restore balance". Baron, who was born in Poland and went to America in 1930 to teach at Columbia University in New York, died aged 94 in 1989, perhaps one of the most significant years in post-war Jewish history. With the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the USSR, the suppression of Jewish religious practice and cultural expression came to an end. More than two million Jews were finally free to choose to be Jewish or not. An astonishing number chose Jewishness and a remarkable revival of Jewish life began. This historic moment aptly illustrates the central truth of Baron's critique. Twenty years on, that revival continues, but the world's response to Israel's war on Gaza and the dramatic rise in anti-Semitic incidents in a number of countries since the war began have led many to paint a very dark picture of the current Jewish predicament. So, in thinking about the accuracy of this, especially in view of the poisonous weed of anti-Semitism that Howard Jacobson, writing in The Independent last month, claims to find growing in…

    Read more...
  • 13:38 - 04.05.2010 News >> Latest

     
    GETTY No explanation for bomb suspect boarding airliner By AP
    Top US law enforcement officials offered no explanation today for how the suspect in the failed Times Square bombing was allowed to board an international flight despite being hunted by the FBI and being placed on the US no-fly list. At a news conference, Attorney General Eric Holder said the suspect, Faisal Shahzad, had admitted trying to set off a car bomb in crowded Times Square on Saturday. He will face terrorism and weapons of mass destruction charges, Holder said.  "Based on what we know so far, it is clear that this was a terrorist plot aimed at murdering Americans in one of the busiest places in our country," Holder said.  Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Shahzad, a Pakistani-born US citizen, was placed on the no-fly list as authorities closed in. She credited Customs officials for recognizing Shahzad's name on a passenger manifest and stopping the flight.  But she had little explanation for how Shahzad was able to board the flight with a last-minute ticket. Passengers on the no-fly list should not be allowed to board a plane.  "I was never in any fear that we were in danger of losing him," Holder said.  But he, too, would not say how a terrorist suspect whose name was being widely circulated by federal law enforcement was allowed to board an airliner two days after a nearly catastrophic bombing.  Shahzad's flight had left the gate. It was called back so authorities could arrest him.  Shahzad is being questioned and has provided useful information, Holder said. The FBI read Shahzad his U.S. constitutional rights to remain silent after he provided information, and he continued to cooperate, FBI Deputy Director John Pistole said. The break in the case came when investigators matched the car's vehicle identification number to a Nissan Pathfinder that had recently been sold for cash in the state of Connecticut. The dashboard registration number had been scratched off, but there are other numbers elsewhere on the car.  President Barack Obama said Tuesday the FBI was investigating possible ties between Shahzad and terrorist groups. Officials would not say whether they believe Shahzad acted alone or as part of a conspiracy.  Shahzad became a US citizen in April 2009 after passing the required criminal and national security background checks. Law enforcement officials familiar with the inquiry say investigators would go through Shahzad's citizenship application line by line to see if he lied about anything  

    Read more...
  • 13:47 - 27.03.2010 News >> Latest

     Immigrant rights supporters rally in L.A.The march downtown is part of an orchestrated effort across the country to pressure lawmakers to move ahead with immigration legislation this year. Read Article

    Read more...
  • 07:24 - 06.05.2010 News >> Latest

     Kirk’s ad boldly sends him to the top of the rich listShatner as Captain KirkFor Captain James T. Kirk, technology was a way to boldly go where no man had gone before. For the man who played him, it was more a way to become insanely rich. William Shatner, who was forced to live in his camper van after the original Star Trek TV series came to an end, has made a colossal sum from becoming the voice and face of an online travel company. Taking Mr Spock’s Vulcan salute of “Live long and prosper” very much to heart, Shatner, 79, is now worth hundreds of millions of dollars courtesy of his starring role in the adverts for Priceline.com. In 1997, when he was hired by the nascent travel comparison site, Shatner agreed to take shares in the company. The shares took a battering during the dot-com bust and were as low as $1.80 in 2000. But they are now heading for $300, and while Priceline has never said how much he is paid or how many shares he holds, his personality, the adverts and the company are inextricably linked. Reports from Wall Street, therefore, have put his fortune at $600 million. The adverts have become an institution in the US, featuring the actor, who has never fought shy of self-mockery, as the Priceline Negotiator. He will stop at nothing to save customers money, they promise, including dancing, doing karate chops and zapping someone with a Taser gun. His performances are widely available on YouTube. In one, in an ironic, Post-Modern touch, the actor is marched into the Priceline office. “We are going to have to let you go,” he is told by a representative of “the new Priceline”. “But who could possibly replace me?” asks Shatner. Enter Leonard Nimoy (aka Mr Spock). The two featured in several subsequent adverts. Shatner’s early adverts for the company parodied his musical career, which began with the 1968 album The Transformed Man, in which he half-talked, half-sang his way through various songs including Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds. The recording regularly ranks in lists of the worst albums ever made. Shatner’s unusual style eventually achieved cult status, which, reluctantly at first, he came to embrace. His self-mockery has not always gone down well with Trekkers, who take the series very seriously; Shatner famously once told them to “get a life”, exclaiming on Saturday Night Live: “I mean, for crying out loud, it’s just a TV show! I mean, look at you, look at the way you’re dressed!” He struggled in the 1970s after the end of the original series and a messy divorce, and at one point he made ends meet by appearing in character at social events. His career was revived by the Star Trek films and success followed as a policeman in T. J. Hooker and an Emmy-winning role in Boston Legal. Kirk-related memorabilia has become a lucrative trade and Shatner…

    Read more...
  • 13:35 - 04.08.2010 News >> Latest

       "US heads for civil war over health insurance"   

    Read more...
Palin brews trouble for Tea Party and GOP Print E-mail

 

Sarah Palin brews trouble for Tea Party

Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin is the darling of the anti-Obama movement, but is coy about her intentions

THEY sang her praises with a country music twang in Nashville yesterday, but not even the sugary lyrics of a specially written Sarah Palin song — Change You Won’t Regret — could hide the tensions between the former Alaska governor and the dyspeptic conservative rabble-rousers collectively known as Tea Party Nation.

As the keynote speaker at the first national convention of the right-wing grassroots activists shaking up Republican politics, Palin was assured of an international spotlight last night as she paid tribute to the “everyday Americans” and “likeminded folks” who have turned anger and frustration at government policies into a 21stcentury revival of the Boston tea party revolt of 1773.

Palin’s paid appearance at a showcase for right-wing rebellion spurred fresh controversy about her political intentions and her relations with a Republican party establishment which is desperate not to derail its chances of ousting President Barack Obama after only one term.

Explaining her enthusiasm for the Tea Party activists last week, Palin praised their “patriotic indignation” and “commonsense conservative policies and values”. She also pledged to attend further rallies in Nevada next month and in Boston in April.

Yet even as she was expressing solidarity with activists fighting against an “out-of-touch political establishment”, it emerged that she had agreed to campaign in Arizona next month for Senator John McCain, her former presidential running mate on the 2008 Republican ticket. McCain is facing a dangerous Senate re-election challenge from the former congressman JD Hayworth, a conservative darling of the Tea Party movement.

After months of acrimony between the McCain and Palin camps over who was more to blame for their defeat by Obama, Palin has evidently decided that the hatchet should be buried — and not in McCain’s back.

Yet her decision to endorse a notoriously moderate Republican stalwart over a Tea Party favourite drew gasps of dismay and a flood of bewildered complaints to Palin’s Facebook page, which has almost 1.3m readers. “I’m extremely disappointed that you would campaign for John McCain,” wrote Patricia Brown, one of her Facebook fans. “He is not a conservative. It makes me wonder if you really believe what you say.”

The Texan tea set have also been stunned by Palin’s support for Governor Rick Perry, who is running for re-election this year. Perry is being challenged by Debra Medina, a former nurse and businesswoman and an early Tea Party campaigner.

“I can’t believe you are backing Perry,” said Christi Cameron, a Medina supporter. “Something is wrong.”

The fuss underlined both the fragile state of the fledgling Tea Party movement, which remains riven with policy disagreements over how its revolt should be managed, and the contradictory pressures of Palin’s widely expected presidential ambitions.

Is she buttering up the party because she intends to run for the White House as a Republican? Or will the Tea Party provide a launchpad for an independent bid? For all its chaotic quarrelling and reckless rhetoric — one speaker warned Americans they would be “boiled to death in the cauldron of the nanny state” — a convention organiser insisted that “people of quality and maturity” were emerging to lead it.

For Republican grandees scenting a comeback after the fiasco of Obama’s imploding healthcare reforms, Palin and her teatime antics represent either an opportunity or a threat, and few have decided which it is.

Even as the Tea Party was drawing up plans for a formal committee that will raise funds and direct support to conservative candidates, senior Republican officials were announcing a scheme of their own to create a new right-wing think tank that will help design the party’s future policies.

The soon-to-be-launched American Action Network includes party heavyweights such as Jeb Bush, brother of George W and a former Florida governor; Haley Barbour, the governor of Mississippi; and the former senator Norm Coleman from Minnesota.

Republican officials recognise that the enthusiasm and commitment of the Tea Party activists could prove a beneficial factor in future elections. Yet many also worry that the Tea Party image of belligerent extremism may alienate middle-of-the-road voters who might be regretting their support for Obama last year.

From the “moose-shootin’ mama” from Alaska — also described in song as “the shining light on the right that the left just doesn’t get” — there was only polite evasion last week as Palin kept the world guessing about her political intentions. The nearest she came to a hint was: “It’s important to keep faith with people who put a little bit of their faith in you.”

 

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Links
DownState News
Latest News

© 2010 Up State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development