Spooks are struggling in AfghanistanThe allied intelligence effort has not covered itself in glory of late, but there are signs of a smarter, grassroots network developingComments (27) Simon Tisdall guardian.co.uk, Article historyAmerican experts in the field make two main points about intelligence gathering in Afghanistan. One is that in a complex and wholly alien cultural, ethnic and linguistic environment, such work is extremely difficult. Their other point is that the US and its allies must do much better if they are to have any chance of "winning" the Afghan campaign.Intelligence weaknesses identified in this week's report for the Centre for a New American Security by Major General Michael Flynn and others will come as no surprise to operatives on the ground. Flynn's criticism that too much attention has focused on insurgents and not enough on understanding, protecting and persuading local people and leaders broadly echoes sentiments expressed by the new Afghan commander, General Stanley McChrystal.Recent failures have lent urgency to fixing the problem. The year just ended was the Taliban's most successful since the 2001 invasion. The insurgents inflicted record casualties on allied forces, extended their influence into relatively settled provinces such as Kunduz, and effectively forced Barack Obama to sack his top commander and order a strategic review.The political fiasco that followed fraud-tainted 2009 presidential elections, exacerbated by low voter turnout, was apparently not foreseen, and certainly not forestalled, by American intelligence – a lapse that recalled the US failure to foresee Hamas's election victory in Palestine in 2006. At the sharp end of the cloak and dagger scale, the CIA suffered a vicious blow when an alleged triple agent penetrated a forward operating base in Khost and killed seven operatives.Not all Washington's problems in Afghanistan can be laid at the door of the intelligence community, any more than airline security breaches are exclusively its fault. Spooks also have a PR problem, in that the nature of their work prevents them from defending themselves in public. But Colonel John Agoglia, director of the counter-insurgency training centre at Camp Dubs outside Kabul, gave an insight into latest thinking on how to make the allied intelligence effort more fit for purpose – or, in a word, smarter."In Afghanistan we've been focused on counter-terrorism, not governance. That's stupid shit. We've been trying to implement a comprehensive integrated approach when we in the alliance don't know what that is. We're learning. The key is to to get the best match of capabilities to address three key issues: security, governance, development. You have to look at it in a holistic way. You have to change the mindset [concerning Afghanistan and the Afghan people]. It's about understanding, leading to respect, leading to trust. You need awareness, you need to take time to go out and learn."In…

 Emma Thompson: 'BNP would love Exeter' Actress's adopted son subjected to racist taunts at Exeter University.   "Thompson and her husband, actor Greg Wise, informally adopted Tindy, a former child soldier, after meeting him at a Refugee Council Christmas party seven years ago. She told her audience that she hoped he would become Britain's first black prime minister."    

  Spell check, anyone?!These Tea-bonics protest signs make absolutely no sense....Read Article

  

  Rupert Cornwell: The real world has little time for prizes Was this an attempt to boost Obama’s prestige as he takes on global problems? If Henry Kissinger's Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 was said to signify the death of satire, the one that's been awarded to Barack Obama may go down as the triumph of naivety. Henry the Great had indeed cosied up to vile regimes in Latin America and ordered the secret bombing of Cambodia. But he was also the arch exponent of realpolitik, who extricated the US from a futile war. That is why he was awarded the prize. This one has gone to an American president in office for less than nine months. Yes, Obama, perhaps more than any president in history, has roused hopes of a new beginning. But nothing leaves a more bitter taste than hope unfulfilled, and therein lies the danger of this premature award. Related articlesNobel honour stuns Obama – and the world Ian Birrell: This award is premature – and potentially very foolish Leading article: It is enough that Obama has given us hope for the future Yes, he's made those fancy speeches – in Berlin in summer 2008 during his pre-election European victory lap, his inaugural address in January, the ones to the Muslim world in April, to the UN General Assembly last month. Not only can Obama dissect and explain a complicated problem as few others, but he's inspirational as well. But, as they say in American politics, where's the beef? To be sure, George W Bush's misbegotten war in Iraq is being wound down. But in the Middle East, Obama's exhortations and strictures to Israelis and Palestinians have this far achieved precisely nothing. Even as he lays out a stirring vision of a nuclear-free world, Iran accelerates its pursuit of a nuclear weapons capacity that might easily ignite a new war in the region. It's all but certain that Obama will miss his deadline of next January for closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay. Nor will honeyed presidential words, the White House already concedes, persuade Congress to arm US delegates to December's climate change conference in Copenhagen with a piece of legislation to prove their good intentions. Then there's Afghanistan. The man praised yesterday for giving the world "the hope of a better future" is considering escalating a conflict in which America's involvement has now lasted as long as in Vietnam – and whose parallels with that failed war grow with every passing day. The difference is that Obama's America has even less chance of imposing its will on Afghanistan – and if it is to succeed there, on the larger, more treacherous stage of nuclear-armed Pakistan next door – than presidents Johnson and Nixon had of victory in South-east Asia. He may have sown the seeds of hope. But then again, so in his time did Jimmy Carter, a president to whom people these days are starting to liken Obama: another good and extremely intelligent…

  When the civil war 'ended'Michael Tomasky: Lee surrendered to Grant 145 years ago today. Let's remind southerners that this happened Read Article