up state news

UpState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 09:07 - 23.11.2009 News >> Latest

      Sarah Palin draws a huge crowd at Fort Bragg November 23, 9:53 AMLA Military Headlines ExaminerMark Nero
    Sarah Palin at the North Post Exchange at Fort Bragg, N.C. (Photo: Jim R. Bounds/AP)Over a thousand people have lined up at the Fort Bragg Army base in North Carolina to see former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who's there as part of a book signing tour.Palin did not make any statement after arriving around 11 a.m. today. She merely waved to the crowd then went inside the base exchange store, where she quickly started signing copies of her new memoir, "Going Rogue: An American Life."Officials estimated as many as 1,500 waited for her arrival. About a dozen people camped out. Fort Bragg is the only scheduled North Carolina stop on Palin’s tour to promote her book, which was published last week.An Army spokesman says Palin will not make a speech, pose for photos, or personalize notes in the books she signs at the on-post store. The lack of a speech was because the Army had been worried the appearance would prompt political grandstanding against President Obama. That fear initially led commanders to limit news coverage, though the restrictions were later dropped.Palin is scheduled to appear at the signing until 2 p.m. local time.  

    Read more...
  • 06:51 - 13.08.2010 News >> Latest

     A war on drugs? No, this is a war on the Mexican people29,000 dead, human rights leaders murdered, the constitution violated – the price of President Calderón's popularity bid Luis Hernandez Navarro guardian.co.uk, Thursday 12 August 2010 Article historyVicente Fox, the former president of Mexico, began his administration in 2000 with a popular festival. Felipe Calderón, who took over in 2006, began his with a show of military force. His affinity for uniforms, army brass bands and public events with the armed forces makes an overt connection between the military and the executive that was unusual in Mexican politics before his presidency.In January 2007 in Apatzingán, Calderón had his picture taken in military uniform, with a five-star cap and the national emblem. In May, again in Apatzingán, another photo op: officers with armoured vehicles and grenade launchers confronted alleged drug traffickers. But this great publicity stunt worried some – drugs are supposed to be under police, not military, jurisdiction.After his 2006 victory was greeted by massive demonstrations over allegations of electoral fraud, Calderón needed to make up for his lack of popular legitimacy. The drug war soon became the central theme of his government. Taking on organised crime – leaning heavily on the army, which helped him into office in the first place, and with financial support from the US – has given Calderón a legitimacy that he did not receive in the voting booth, while militarising politics has given him the tools to run the country using emergency measures normally reserved for wartime. Here Calderón followed much the same script used by George Bush after 9/11, when the US president made war the constituent power of a neoconservative order. But, instead of sending troops to Iraq or Afghanistan, the Mexican president has ordered them into the streets of their own country.The army now virtually occupies communities throughout the country, carrying out functions that, under the constitution, are not the responsibility of the armed forces: it has set up checkpoints, de facto curfews and inspections. In what appears to be the pilot of a plan for the entire country, in several northern states there is a situation that resembles a state of siege – one never decreed by congress.In the short term, the politicisation of public security has worked for the president. Surveys show relatively high approval ratings, although they have been falling in recent months. Drug trafficking existed before Calderón took office, but his handling of it – while successful in terms of his popularity – has been a disaster for security. The president launched a war without a plan, and without assessing the consequences. Now he does not know where to go.Recently, Calderón announced that there was to be a debate on the legalisation of marijuana in Mexico, while adding that he himself is against legalisation. Many people, including the leader of the opposition Institutional Revolutionary party, warn that this is merely an attempt to distract attention from the main issue…

    Read more...
  • 09:44 - 21.04.2009 News >> Latest

      Obama nominee touches a nerve       

    Read more...
  • 05:58 - 20.10.2009 News >> Latest

      What Obama can do for Latin AmericaThe US president could do much to earn his Nobel peace prize by undoing George Bush's policies south of the borderComments (75)Ariel Dorfman guardian.co.uk, Monday 19 October 2009 19.30 BST Of all the regions in a dangerous and intractable world, forgotten Latin America might paradoxically offer Barack Obama the best opportunity to influence events so that the "hope for the future" embodied in his recent Nobel peace prize becomes a reality.Building upon his creative engagement with the continent after the Bush years of blindness and neglect, there is much the president can accomplish immediately. Lifting the senseless blockade against Cuba, followed by full diplomatic relations, would be a good beginning. Another sore spot is Honduras, where the US has not done enough to isolate and punish the de facto government, which stubbornly clings to power after having ousted the legally elected Manuel Zelaya. And Obama should rethink his approach to continental security (cancelling, for instance, Plan Colombia), as a way of defusing tensions in a Latin America threatened by a new arms race.The US, one of the largest Spanish-speaking countries in the world, could also send a signal of friendship to Latin America by legalising the situation of millions of undocumented Latino workers, tearing down walls instead of erecting them.On another front, presidents Álvaro Uribe and Felipe Calderón, seconded by Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, have valiantly opened up a tentative conversation about the failed "war on drugs". If Obama were to encourage, and perhaps imitate, their efforts to decriminalise the use of marijuana, it would help alter an irrational policy that has generated a mafia of narcotraficantes across the Americas, filling jails and devastating the young.And, of course, there are the real wars to win in Latin America. Against poverty and tyranny, against ecological depredation and the marginalisation of the indigenous peoples and their wisdom. The president, with his immense heart and his inspirational words, could be a fundamental partner in our quest for a better future.Incredibly, the continent where I was born has only received five Nobel peace prizes in the 108 years since the award was instituted. If Obama were to carry out a truly enlightened policy towards the countries south of the border, I can envision how the citizens of Latin America might some day claim that in 2009, that prize was really, all appearances to the contrary, once again offered to one of our own. Maybe some day history will declare that Obama was, at least in spirit, the sixth Latin American to be given this honour.   

    Read more...
  • 11:01 - 13.05.2009 News >> Latest

      From The Times of London
    May 13, 2009 Crime lords 'running empires from jail using PlayStations'

    Read more...
Notice it's now "Obama's secret war" Print E-mail

 

School bombing exposes Obama’s secret war inside Pakistan

A resident attempts to rescue female students from the rubble of a bombing which hit near a school in Timergara

Victims trapped in the rubble after a suicide bombing at the opening of a school for girls in the northwestern Pakistani town of Dir last week

The three American soldiers among the dead in a suicide bombing at the opening of a girls’ school in the northwestern Pakistan town of Dir last week reignited the fears of many Pakistanis that Washington was set on invading their country.

Barack Obama has banned the Bush-era term “war on terror” and dithered about sending extra troops to Afghanistan, but across the border in Pakistan, the US president has dramatically stepped up the covert war against Islamic extremists.

US airstrikes in Pakistan, launched from unmanned drones, are now averaging three a week, triple the number last year. “We're quietly seeing a geographical shift,” an intelligence officer said.

For the past month drones have pounded the tribal region of North Waziristan in apparent retaliation for the murder of seven CIA officers in Afghanistan by a Jordanian suicide bomber working with the Pakistani Taliban.  

Last week America launched its first multiple drone attack, according to Pakistani security officials. Eighteen missiles were fired from eight unmanned aircraft in Dattakhel village, killing 16 people.

The discovery of the dead US soldiers revealed that America’s shadowy war in Pakistan not only involves drones but also small cadres of special operations soldiers.

Pakistan’s foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, insisted that US troops were in Pakistan only to provide counter-insurgency training for the Frontier Corps, a paramilitary force operating in the tribal areas.

Other sources said there were about 200 US military inside the country. “I’m not sure you could just call it training,” one official said. “They are hardly behind the wire if they are on trips to schools in Dir.”

The three US soldiers, who have been described variously as special operations forces and civil affairs troops, were killed when their convoy was bombed as it travelled to the re-opening of the school. It had been rebuilt with US aid after being bombed by the Taliban last year.

Three schoolgirls, two villagers and a Pakistani soldier were also killed in the attack, for which the Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility. More than 100 were wounded, mostly schoolgirls.

It was officially reported that the device was a remote-controlled bomb. It has now emerged that a suicide bomber rammed into the vehicle carrying the Americans. This suggests the bomber had inside information. “This attack was too perfect: they lay in wait for the convoy to pass and knew exactly which vehicle to hit,” a US military officer told the Long War Journal.

One of those killed was Sergeant Matthew Sluss-Tiller, 35, the father of a three-year-old daughter. His mother, Jane Blankenship, said her son had been in Pakistan on a civil affairs mission and had grown a beard for it.

One official suggested the “trainers” may be used to pick up intelligence on drone targets, particularly because the CIA did not trust its counterparts from the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence service that has close links to the Taliban.

The Americans insist the drone attacks have been a success, picking off the second and third tier of Al-Qaeda’s leadership. In August they killed Baitullah Mehsud, leader of the Pakistani Taliban. They recently claimed to have killed his successor, Hakimullah Mehsud, but Pakistan’s foreign minister said this had not been confirmed.

To the irritation of Washington, Islamabad has kept up a pretence that drone attacks are carried out without its approval, even though the aircraft are based in Pakistan.

Among the Pakistani public, there has been outcry at the attacks. Surveys constantly show that Pakistanis consider the US a greater threat than the Taliban, despite 3,021 Pakistani deaths in terrorist attacks last year.

If the drones are controversial, the presence of US soldiers on Pakistani soil is far more so. Despite a $1.5 billion (£959m) aid programme, Robert Gates, the US defence secretary, had to fly into Pakistan two weeks ago to reassure its military leadership. “Let me say definitively the US does not covet a single inch of Pakistani soil,” he told Pakistan’s National Defence University.

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Links
DownState News
Latest News

© 2010 Up State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development