up state news

mod_dbrss2 AJAX RSS Reader poweredbysimplepie
UpState News
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 08:53 - 03.10.2009 News >> Latest

      Will the Real President Stand Up?
    By David S. Broder
    Sunday, October 4, 2009
        Barack Obama has reached the moment of truth for answering the persistent question about his core beliefs and political priorities. The coming votes in the House and Senate on his signature health-care reform effort will tell us more about the president than anything so far in his White House tenure. The challenge is not one he invited. All during last year's campaign, Obama skillfully skirted the question of whether he was a moderate, consensus-seeking pragmatist, as his words suggested, or a faithful adherent to the liberal agenda, as his voting record demonstrated. In stylistic terms, he cultivated the pragmatic image. On issues, he was alternately one or the other -- lining up with the liberals on Iraq and civil liberties, for example, but joining the hard-liners on Afghanistan and the budget. In the campaign, he took the moderate side of the health-care debate -- disagreeing with Hillary Clinton on the necessity for an individual mandate to buy health insurance and suggesting that he would be satisfied with incremental progress toward covering all the uninsured. But now, a number of factors have combined to strip him of the camouflage that he once enjoyed when it comes to health-care policy. His effort to craft a bipartisan package with significant Republican support has failed, as GOP leaders in Congress have chosen to take their chances on handing him a costly defeat rather than opting to claim a share of the credit for success. With Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine apparently the only Republican who might vote for the evolving legislation, Obama will have to find virtually all the votes he needs among his fellow Democrats. Also, the debates inside the five House and Senate committees that have shared in drafting the bills have dramatized the deep ideological splits on the Democratic side of the aisle. The symbolic issue has been the public option -- the proposal for a Medicare-like insurance plan competing with those offered by private companies. Four of the five committees have included that proposal; the fifth, the Senate Finance Committee, has explicitly rejected it. Beyond that much-hyped dispute are multiple disagreements on the cost and financing of the overall reform, with no consensus between the more conservative Democratic Blue Dogs and the more numerous liberals, especially in the House. The first imperative for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is to find a formula that will produce 218 Democratic votes in the House and 59 of the needed 60 votes in the Senate. Obama will have to be an active player in that process. But he also will have to negotiate something that will be workable in the real world. As he contemplates a reelection race in 2012, he needs at least three years when his most important domestic initiative has not blown up in his face. What are…

    Read more...
  • 07:34 - 15.07.2010 News >> Latest

     Under Fire, Apple to Discuss iPhoneApple said it would hold a news conference Friday to discuss its iPhone 4 amid mounting criticism of the smartphone's reception problems. Read Article    

    Read more...
  • 13:35 - 07.09.2009 News >> Latest

           "Mr. Kennedy, 56, said in a statement that he would instead continue to run Citizens Energy, a nonprofit group he founded in 1979 to provide low-cost heating oil to the poor. Mr. Kennedy’s decision, which friends said he had agonized over, is likely to leave Massachusetts without a Kennedy in elected office for the first time in almost 50 years."
      

    Read more...
  • 10:13 - 04.06.2010 News >> Latest

      Immigration Debate Defines G.O.P. Race in CaliforniaBy ADAM NAGOURNEYIRVINE, Calif. — Meg Whitman was almost at the end of a 30-minute town hall-style meeting here, responding to questions about taxes and spending, schools and unemployment. But one topic had not come up, so Ms. Whitman, a Republican candidate for governor, raised it herself, serving up a stern attack against illegal immigration and a promise that she would protect California’s borders. “I am 100 percent against amnesty,” Ms. Whitman proclaimed. “My Republican opponent says I’m for amnesty. That is absolutely not true.” For almost a year, Ms. Whitman, the former chief executive of eBay, has campaigned on three issues: jobs, education and government spending. But as her contest for the Republican gubernatorial nomination against Steve Poizner, the state insurance commissioner, enters its final days, she has found herself drawn into a loud and caustic argument over immigration policy. “It is the only issue,” said Stuart Stevens, Mr. Poizner’s chief campaign consultant. The primary here on Tuesday will be the highest-stakes electoral contest since Arizona approved a tough immigration law, and that has allowed Mr. Poizner to reshape the campaign, focusing on the issue with a series of stark tough attacks on Ms. Whitman’s record on the issue, which drew her into a sharp defense of her record. The extent to which immigration has, in the view of many Republicans, hijacked this contest has stirred worry that the nominee chosen next week will be weakened in the general election against Jerry Brown, a Democrat and former governor. “There’s a difference between talking about a problem and trying to exploit the problem as a wedge issue to try to get scared white voters,” said Allan Hoffenblum, a Republican analyst here. “I’m not speaking as a lone wolf on this in the Republican Party. It’s concerning a lot of us.” Hispanics are becoming increasingly influential in California politics. One in six voters this November is expected to be Hispanic — a proportion that is likely to grow in coming years — and Southern California has been at the forefront of efforts to boycott Arizona for enacting tough anti-immigrant legislation in late April. In many ways, California’s primary race offers a worrisome preview of what many Republicans say are the political perils for the party nationally in being identified with tough immigration policies. Mr. Poizner has enthusiastically endorsed such policies in his campaign. His series of stark television advertisements portraying Ms. Whitman as an advocate of permissive immigration began three weeks ago. The emphasis on immigration is striking in a state that is reeling from the economic downturn and saddled with what officials in both parties view as a dysfunctional government. At 12.5 percent, the unemployment rate here is far above the national average, and the state has been hit hard by the foreclosure crisis, its public education system is a shambles, and…

    Read more...
  • 06:42 - 07.10.2009 News >> Latest

      Joshua Lott for The New York TimesSheriff Joe Arpaio, right, at a news conference in Arizona on Tuesday with Andrew Thomas, the Maricopa county attorney.  "That prompted an angry, rambling outburst from the sheriff Tuesday at a news conference at which he called Homeland Security officials “liars” and vowed to press on with his campaign, using state laws, against illegal immigrants. He said he would drive those caught on the streets to the border if federal officers refused to take them into custody."  

    Read more...
Russian Mafia operates freely on French Riviera

 

Russian mafia taking over French Riviera

Mafia kingpins from the former Soviet Union have moved into the French Riviera and are taking over with ?quasi-military? precision.

Mafia kingpins from the former Soviet Union have moved into the French Riviera and are taking over with “quasi-military” precision.

Read Article

 

 

 

 
Top-heavy TV nets soon to feel obsolete.

 

[0831amazon]

Amazon Working on TV, Movie Service

Amazon.com is trying to create a service that gives paying subscribers unlimited access over the Internet to some television shows and movies, as it tries to take on Netflix and Apple

Read Article

 

 

 

 

 
At peace in Islam, in jail for life

 

Guide for interrogators tells how FBI agent turned suspect into informant

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, August 30, 2010

 

 

FBI Special Agent Stephen Gaudin "reached into his pocket and handed out butterscotch candy to everyone in the truck, including the detainee."

It was Aug. 11, 1998, four days after a bombing at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, killed 218 people - including 12 Americans - and wounded thousands. Gaudin was part of an FBI-run team that had flown to Nairobi three days earlier to help authorities investigate.

With two Kenyan military police officers and a New York police detective, he was following up on a tip that a "man who didn't fit in" was staying at a hotel in a Nairobi suburb inhabited primarily by Somalis. The Kenyans had gone into the hotel and returned with the cleanly dressed suspect who had stitches on his forehead, bandages on his hands, $32 in Kenyan money and eight new $100 U.S. bills.

He said he was Yemeni, spoke Arabic - with minimal English and no Swahili - and said all his belongings had been lost in the blast. He had a card from a Nairobi hospital - dated the day of the attack - that had been given to those who were treated for wounds. The Kenyans had taken him into custody for questioning because he had no identification or passport. They put him, without handcuffs, in the back of the truck with Gaudin.

Reading like the plot of a television crime show, the details of the encounter come from a newly disclosed 2009 teaching guide for government interrogators by the director of national intelligence's Intelligence Science Board. The guide provides previously undisclosed daily accountings of how Gaudin and his colleagues turned that suspect, a trained Saudi jihadist named Mohamed Rashed Daoud al-Owhali, from a resisting witness with an alias and a cover story to a confessed participant in the bombing and, over time, a cooperative informant who eventually provided actionable intelligence.

The board's study, disclosed last week by Steven Aftergood on his Secrecy News Web site, teaches that "there also are no guarantees that non-coercive intelligence interviewing will obtain the necessary information. However, the United States has important recent examples of effective, non-coercive intelligence interviewing with high value detainees."

Gaudin's use of the candy "affirmed, even if very briefly, a shared 'human' identity with the detainee" and "may have begun to set the stage for reducing resistances and for creating opportunities to persuade," the study says.

Nonetheless, during the first day of questioning, conducted for an hour in broken English, the suspect gave his cover story: He was a salesman from Yemen visiting a friend. He was near the embassy at the time of the explosion. He was wounded and lost his briefcase in the chaos. He was transferred from a clinic to a hospital, where he was treated and then returned to his hotel. He said he was wearing the same clothes he wore on the day of the blast.

The story did not sound right, so officials sought an Arab interpreter to try to get a clearer picture. That afternoon, when the interpreter turned out to be a woman, they set up a curtain between her and the suspect.

The study noted that Gaudin was respecting a "demonstrated appreciation" for the Muslim beliefs of the suspect and the interpreter.

After the suspect said one sentence, the interpreter told the Americans that he was speaking a classical Arabic, indicating that he was well-educated. During the three-hour interview, the suspect gave more personal details and agreed to have his wounds photographed. A bandage was found on his back.

Gaudin shared meals with the suspect, including a concoction familiar to soldiers. The suspect's reaction led Gaudin, a former Army Ranger, to conclude that he had a military background. The next day, having checked out details and found inconsistencies, Gaudin's partner began questioning with an accusatory tone.

The "good cop/bad cop" approach had not been planned but "appeared authentic," the study found.

When Gaudin took over, he did not confront the suspect about his lies. Rather, he said that the suspect failed as a soldier to successfully follow his counter-interrogation training. During the questioning, Gaudin confronted the suspect about his inconsistencies, finally getting him to admit that his clean clothes were not the ones he wore the day he was injured. They brought in another FBI agent, one who had broad knowledge of al-Qaeda from having interrogated the terrorists responsible for the first World Trade Center bombing. He gave the suspect a sense of status by asking about Osama bin Laden.

The suspect's "eyes narrowed and he stopped talking. A small smile appeared on his face," according to the study. Immediately asked for the first phone number he called after the bombing, the suspect - apparently caught off guard - gave the number of an al-Qaeda safe house in Yemen and then remained silent. Over the next two days, the interrogators determined that the suspect "was emotionally affected by the attack and cared enough to defend his position and group's cause," the study said.

Within two more days, they realized that the suspect spoke and read English. An older Lebanese American FBI interpreter was brought in. With information from the Yemen phone number, the FBI team on Aug. 22 made the suspect listen as it demolished his cover story. At that point, Owhali dropped his alias and developed a new fallback position, based, he told Gaudin, on an expectation that he eventually would be released in a prisoner swap: "If you promise I'll be tried in the United States, I'll tell you everything. America is my enemy, not Kenya. I will tell you all about involvement with the bombings, bin Laden and al-Qaeda."

He did. He warned about future attacks, including one on the United States and another on a Navy ship refueling in the port of Aden. On May 29, 2001, Owhali was among four co-defendants convicted of the Kenya bombing. He was in prison on Sept. 11, 2001, just six blocks from the World Trade Center. He is now in the maximum-security federal prison in Florence, Colo., sentenced to life without parole.

 

 

 
Why Newt Gingrich Will Never Be President

 

How Damning Is Esquire's Newt Gingrich Profile?

 

 
Defeated Dems to focus on post-election session.

 

The New Gallup Poll: Death Knell for Dems?

The New Gallup Poll: Death Knell for Dems?

 Read Article

 

 

 

 
Medical Bracelets Go High-Tech

 

[informedJ2]

Medical Bracelets Go High-Tech

New bracelets and other medical-identification systems can fill in first responders on practically a patient's complete health history. They're a far cry from the simple

Read Article

 

 

 

 
The White House Life of the Obama Girls

 

Read Article

 
Google to read your mind/mail

 

Gmail to add mind-reading mailbox

Gmail to offer priority mailbox

 Read Article

 

 

 

 

 
How to "Shield" Assets Like the Rich

 

How to Shield Assets Like the Rich

There are many lessons in the high-price McCourt divorce being argued this week, but the greatest lesson from the salacious split between Jamie and Frank McCourt has gone mostly unnoticed: the lesson of how the wealthy shield their assets from creditors.

 Read Article

 

 

 

 

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 46 - 54 of 6691
Links
DownState News
Latest News

© 2010 Up State News - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development